Home » Top Stories » U.S. "disappointed" by disaster of Iran-IAEA atom talks

U.S. "disappointed" by disaster of Iran-IAEA atom talks

Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:31am EDT

VIENNA (Reuters) – Lack of swell in talks between Iran and a International Atomic Energy Agency is unsatisfactory and it shows Tehran’s continued disaster to reside by a joining to a U.N. chief watchdog, a U.S. attach� pronounced on Saturday.

The IAEA and Iran unsuccessful during talks on Friday to unblock an review into suspected atom explosve investigate by a Islamic state, a reversal dimming any chances for success in higher-level negotiations between Tehran and vital powers after this month.

The IAEA, a Vienna-based U.N. agency, pronounced no swell had been done in a assembly directed during sealing a horizon understanding on resuming a long-stalled investigation.

Six universe powers were scrutinizing a IAEA-Iran assembly to decider either a Iranians were prepared to make concessions before a resumption of wider-ranging negotiations with them in Moscow on Jun 18-19 on a decade-old chief dispute.

“We’re disappointed,” Robert Wood, a behaving U.S. attach� to a IAEA, told Reuters in an emailed comment.

“Yesterday’s outcome highlights Iran’s continued disaster to reside by a joining to a IAEA, and serve underscores a need for it to work with a IAEA to residence general community’s genuine concerns,” he said.

The IAEA had been dire Tehran for an settle that would give a inspectors evident entrance to a Parchin troops complex, where it believes explosives tests applicable for a growth of chief arms have taken place, and suspects Iran might now be cleaning a site of any damning evidence.


The United States, European powers and Israel wish to quell Iranian atomic activities they fear are dictated to furnish chief bombs. The Islamic Republic says a chief module is meant quite to furnish appetite for municipal uses.

Both a IAEA and Iran – that insists it will work with a U.N. group to infer allegations of a chief weapons bulletin are “forged and fabricated” – pronounced before Friday’s assembly that poignant advance had been done on a procedural document.

But differences persisted over how a IAEA should control a inquiry, in that U.N. inspectors wish entrance to sites, papers and officials.

“The IAEA and Iran have on some points significantly diverging ideas of how a new agreement would look,” pronounced Mark Hibbs of a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

But Hibbs pronounced “negative” signals from Vienna did not indispensably have to meant anything in a talks in Moscow between Iran and a 6 powers – a United States, Russia, France, Germany, Britain and China.

The talks followed by universe powers are directed during defusing tragedy over Iran’s chief works that has led to increasingly tough Western sanctions on Iran, including an EU oil embargo from Jul 1, and stoked fears of another Middle East war.

Full clarity and team-work with a IAEA is one of a elements a universe powers are seeking from Iran.

But they also wish Iran to stop a higher-grade uranium enrichment, that Tehran says it needs for a investigate reactor though that also takes it closer to intensity explosve material.

For a part, Iran wants sanctions service and general approval of what it says is a right to labour uranium.

“If a West creates a critical offer to Iran, we could see genuine progress. But if Moscow fails to pierce forward, we’ll have large problems,” Hibbs said.

(Reporting by Fredrik Dahl; Editing by Alessandra Rizzo)

Source: Article Source

Filed under Top Stories and tagged , , , , , , , , , .

Leave a Reply