(Reuters) – The New York Post is seeking to keep a tip editor from carrying to answer questions in a disposition lawsuit about his discussions with media noble Rupert Murdoch over a published animation that seemed to collate President Barack Obama to a chimpanzee.
Calling a Feb 2009 animation “quintessential domestic debate entitled to a strongest protections of a First Amendment,” a journal in a justice filing late Friday night also pronounced a discussions were irrelevant to a lawsuit brought by Sandra Guzman, a former associate editor.
In Nov 2009, Guzman, who is black and Puerto Rican, sued a Post, a editor Col Allan and a primogenitor News Corp for purported taste and nuisance on a basement of race, gender and inhabitant origin, observant she had been dismissed in plea for complaints over inapt conduct.
She also claimed to have objected to a cartoon, that referred to a $787 billion sovereign mercantile impulse and decorated a policeman sharpened a demented chimpanzee, a play on an tangible occurrence in Connecticut. Many people suspicion a animal was meant to etch Obama, and Murdoch after apologized to readers.
In a Jun 29 order, Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis in Manhattan had systematic Allan, in a two-hour deposition, to answer questions, including over either he told Murdoch he disagreed with edition an apology, and either he suspicion Murdoch believed it was a mistake to do so.
But in Friday’s filing, a defendants argued that a sequence would let Guzman crack “the heart of a editorial process,” and asked District Judge Barbara Jones to retreat it.
The defendants pronounced a animation was dictated to ridicule Congress’ drafting of impulse legislation and done no anxiety to race. They also called Guzman’s ask “nothing some-more than a fishing speed that would invade and chill a editor’s and newspaper’s First Amendment rights to domestic expression.”
A counsel for Guzman did not immediately respond on Sunday to a ask for comment.
The box is Guzman v News Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-09323.
(Reporting By Jonathan Stempel in New York; modifying by Gunna Dickson)
Source: Article Source