PHILADELPHIA (AP) — As they frantically searched for ways to salvage ’s failed reelection bid, his campaign pursued a dizzying game of legal hopscotch that centered on the biggest prize of all: Pennsylvania.

The strategy may have played well in front of television cameras and on talk radio. But it has proved a , where judges uniformly rejected their claims of vote fraud and found the campaign’s legal work amateurish.

late Saturday, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann — a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania — compared the campaign’s legal arguments to “Frankenstein’s Monster,” concluding that Trump’s team offered only “speculative accusations,” not proof of rampant corruption.

Now, as the legal doors close on Trump’s

Read More At Article Source | Article Attribution