Supreme Court Ruling Causing Confusion In Michigan, Even Though Abortion There Is Legal

by | Jun 25, 2022 | Politics

Friday’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade is creating confusion and may be limiting access in Michigan’s largest hospital system, even though a judge in the state has already said abortion should remain available while legal disputes over its status work through Michigan courts. It’s one more sign of how far-reaching the ruling’s impact has been. It’s also a reminder of how much access to abortion in some states could depend on the outcome of November’s elections.AdvertisementMichigan is one of those states where courts had long blocked enforcement of an old abortion ban because it violated Roe v. Wade. Earlier this year, as a U.S. Supreme Court ruling invalidating Roe seemed imminent, Democratic elected officials and abortion rights advocates asked the state courts to act once again ― this time, by declaring the 1931 ban incompatible with guarantees of personal liberty in Michigan’s state constitution.Last month, one of those appeals prevailed with a lower court judge, who issued an injunction blocking enforcement until state courts could rule definitively on the 1931 ban’s constitutionality. Providers like Planned Parenthood are continuing to provide abortion as before, while top state officials including Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer have said repeatedly that abortion remains legal in the state while the injunction is in place.Because of a temporary injunction, abortion is still legal in Michigan.— Governor Gretchen Whitmer (@GovWhitmer) June 25, 2022

AdvertisementBut on Friday evening, the chief executive officer of BHSH Health System emailed staff to say that the network of hospitals and providers was suspending abortions, except to save a mother’s life, in order to comply with the 1931 law. The memos ― first reported by Crain’s Detroit Business and the Detroit News ― prompted an outcry on social media, including from doctors and Democratic elected officials citing their understanding that abortion in Michigan remains legal, at least for now.A few hours later, just before midnight, BHSH’s CEO sent yet another email to staff offering “clarity.” That memo said the system would continue to provide abortions in “non-emergent” cases of medical necessity following “proactive” review by a group of health care providers.The memos didn’t define terms like “non-emergent” or “medical necessity.” The BHSH media office did not respond to HuffPost questions on Saturday, except to cite the two emails that have caused the confusion. “I do not think there is legal ambiguity about where things stand with respect to the current state of the law in Michigan.”- Eli Savit, prosecutor for Washtenaw County, MichiganIt’s not even certain that the system has meaningfully changed how it approaches abortion. Large health networks frequently refer most elective abortions to independent providers like Planned Parenthood anyway.AdvertisementBut the BHSH emails are clear on one point. They say that officials are concerned about “legal ambiguity” over abortion. And a likely source of that ambiguity is the threat of legal action from county prosecutors. Two conservative prosecutors who support the 1931 law have already petitioned higher state courts to remove the injunction. They could attempt to bring a case now, even without a ruling lifting the injunction, claiming that it applies only to state officials and independently elected county attorneys. I don’t understand this response at …

Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source

Share This