Using ChatGPT without citation could be seen as unethical or even regarded as plagiarism. It’s a debate that has been raging in academic, legal, journalistic and other professional circles. But there are other, perhaps more timely and important, questions: Question No. 1: Does ChatGPT itself plagiarize other people’s work? Question No. 2: And does it engage in copyright infringement?
Lawyers, and AI experts have their own view, but how would ChatGPT answer these questions? MarketWatch decided to find out. First, some background: The question of whether ChatGPT itself engages in copyright infringement is the subject of several class-action lawsuits on behalf of several authors, including the comedienne Sarah Silverman. Silverman last month announced that she had decided to join a class-action suit against OpenAI and Facebook-owner Meta
META,
-2.50%
for copyright infringement. The lawsuit contends that her 2010 memoir was copied by the AI system “without consent, without credit and without compensation.” ChatGPT, an artificial-intelligence search engine, is a product of OpenAI, and made its free, public debut last December. It can answer questions, give advice, produce creative writing, research academic and legal issues — with varying degrees of accuracy — and some observers even say it can even be employed by financial advisers to pick stocks. OpenAI’s algorithm sweeps across the web for answers to dish out in seconds to its users, using large language models (or LLMs), a kind of artificial intelligence that mimics human responses. Joseph Saveri and Matthew Butterick, the lawyers representing Silverman and other writers, were blunt in their view of OpenAI and other AI chatbots, and are attempting to draw a direct line between aggregation of information from the web, plagiarism and copyright infringement. In a joint statement, they wrote that OpenAI and Meta are “industrial-st …
Article Attribution | Read More at Article Source
Lawyers, and AI experts have their own view, but how would ChatGPT answer these questions? MarketWatch decided to find out. First, some background: The question of whether ChatGPT itself engages in copyright infringement is the subject of several class-action lawsuits on behalf of several authors, including the comedienne Sarah Silverman. Silverman last month announced that she had decided to join a class-action suit against OpenAI and Facebook-owner Meta
META,
-2.50%
for copyright infringement. The lawsuit contends that her 2010 memoir was copied by the AI system “without consent, without credit and without compensation.” ChatGPT, an artificial-intelligence search engine, is a product of OpenAI, and made its free, public debut last December. It can answer questions, give advice, produce creative writing, research academic and legal issues — with varying degrees of accuracy — and some observers even say it can even be employed by financial advisers to pick stocks. OpenAI’s algorithm sweeps across the web for answers to dish out in seconds to its users, using large language models (or LLMs), a kind of artificial intelligence that mimics human responses. Joseph Saveri and Matthew Butterick, the lawyers representing Silverman and other writers, were blunt in their view of OpenAI and other AI chatbots, and are attempting to draw a direct line between aggregation of information from the web, plagiarism and copyright infringement. In a joint statement, they wrote that OpenAI and Meta are “industrial-st …nnDiscussion:nn” ai_name=”RocketNews AI: ” start_sentence=”Can I tell you more about this article?” text_input_placeholder=”Type ‘Yes'”]